Saturday, September 24, 2016

If I Were President: Creating Access to Mental Health Care

Guess what – I’ve just been elected President of the United States. (Just kidding, this election year is crazy enough already.) But if I were, here are three things I would change about access to mental health care in this country:

Provide universal coverage. You need mental health care. You have insurance coverage. So you go out and get mental health care and pay for it with your insurance coverage, right?

Wrong. Often people are limited to closed lists of in-network providers (many of whom are full), can’t see certain classes of therapists such as LMFTs (like me) or LMHCs, or face other roadblocks to care. And the worst offenders are often taxpayer-supported programs like Medicare, Medicaid, or the VA.

My solution would be to pass a nationwide Any Willing Provider law. If you are a licensed psychotherapist, you can provide services to anyone. Period. And insurance must pay for it. Period.

Let psychotherapists practice nationwide. Therapists can now technically practice anywhere, thanks to online technology. But there is one huge roadblock standing in the way: a stupid and outdated crazy quilt of state licensing laws.

If I practice outside of New York or Arizona, where I am licensed, I could actually face felony charges in some states. My malpractice insurance would also become void. It would literally be easier and legally less risky for me to treat someone in Uzbekistan than in, say, Ohio.

Worse, every state has its own incompatible requirements. Many have different course and credit hour requirements, forcing you to go back to school. Some will not accept a distance learning degree. And California, because they are special, makes everyone start all over again as an intern and then take their own exam. State requirements not only dramatically limit access to online therapy, they often trash the careers of good therapists who must move to another state for personal or family reasons.

If I were President, I would create national licensure for therapists. Or at least require the easy fix of license reciprocity. If you have been practicing therapy for, say, five years and haven’t killed anyone, there should be no good reason you cannot practice in any state of this great country.

Mandate coverage of telepractice. Finally, the last piece of the puzzle is providing financial coverage for online therapy. Telepractice is now legal in most if not all states. The problem is that insurance usually won’t cover it, so you can’t have it unless you can afford it yourself. This in turn denies care to people who could really use online therapy, like the housebound, people in remote communities, shift workers, and areas with few therapists or long waiting lists.

Legislating this has turned out to be extremely slippery. New York, for example, now has a Telehealth Parity Law mandating such coverage – but it is limited to specific types of therapists (not including LMFTs, unfortunately), and is full of loopholes: for example, it does not mandate how much insurers would reimburse for such sessions, requiring follow-up legislation. As President I would order everyone to cut the comedy and just cover online therapy at par with regular in-office therapy.

Of course, I am not going to be President anytime soon – thank goodness. So instead of wasting your vote on me, I am going to ask you to do the next best thing: become aware of legislation affecting access to mental health care in your state, and make your voice heard so that everyone gets the care they deserve. Thank you!

Monday, July 11, 2016

The Wallenda Strategy: Making OCD Treatment Easier

(Note: This is an article I published privately for my peers in the OCD treatment community a while back, after attending the 2015 OCD conference in Boston. It received a good response, including positive comments from the director of the International OCD Foundation. While this article is aimed at fellow therapists, I am posting it here for interested lay people and OCD sufferers as well.

As a postscript: in 2018, I published a research poster paper at the 2018 IOCDF conference in Washington, DC about this approach, showing a 90% treatment response rate across my own cases. A link to this paper is here.)

What do people who suffer from obsessive-compulsive disorder – one of the most maddening neurological mental illnesses – have in common with tightrope walker Nik Wallenda? Perhaps more than we give them credit for.

OCD treatment has come a long way. Just over twenty years ago there were no conferences, few proven treatment options, and a lot of really ill people out there. Today there is much more hope, much better treatment, and a very active and engaged research community. Particularly in the area of exposure and response therapy (ERP), now viewed as the gold standard for OCD psychotherapy.

However, I feel ERP still suffers from a PR problem - one that could be fixed with better linguistics. According to current literature, treatment refusal and dropout rates for ERP can total 30% or more. Add those who relapse, or get “stuck” beyond a certain point of treatment, and you have a lot of people suffering – often after working hard and going through a lot of discomfort. Some of my own clients frankly disclose that when they first read about OCD treatment, they walked away feeling dejected and hopeless, because they felt they lacked the bravery to pursue it.

This is where Nik Wallenda comes in. He is famous for high-wire feats such as crossing the Grand Canyon or Niagara Falls. But he prepares for these events by practicing for hundreds of hours on a wire that is just a few feet off the ground, safe and supported at all times. In other words, he loses his fears by making himself comfortable enough to do a lot of practice, and gradually but continually improve.

I use a Wallenda strategy with many of my OCD clients. I don't talk about bravely facing their fears. I don't focus on habituation or extinction bursts. Instead, after we do some cognitive work and create an exposure hierarchy, I give them the following instructions for daily practice:

Start in your comfort zone, stay in your comfort zone, and see where you can take your comfort zone from week to week.

This puts clients completely in charge of whatever they feel ready for – but it also gives them an incentive to track their progress and continually improve. Wherever they feel safe is where we start, whether it is gradual exposure and response prevention, imagery or mindfulness practice. Then I give them plenty of support and encouragement.

Sometimes clients surprise me with their rapid gains, which I cheer enthusiastically. Other times it is a game of small steps or setbacks, which I normalize and empathize with. Sometimes they feel stuck and we explore new strategies, such as imagery desensitization. Either way, I stay unfailingly positive as I encourage them to keep practicing and turn their battle with OCD into lots and lots of easy.

And you know what? It seems to work. I am just one small sample – a private practice in the middle of upstate New York. But on standardized assessment measures of OCD, I generally get very good clinical outcomes with my clients compared with what I see in the literature. With two key differences: (a) it some cases, it may take us longer to get there and (b) they almost never drop out.

I realize this approach isn't for everyone. For example, serious cases such as inpatient clients may need stronger exposures to get better quickly. For others, doing what they never thought they could do might be an important teachable moment. And I realize that some people could technically skate along with minimal exposure and make no progress - although I find that time and patience actually lead most of my clients to improve. But I have come to feel that most people do their very best with OCD treatment when we make getting well seem easier than staying ill.

I suspect that behind closed doors, this is how many of us actually treat OCD anyway, if we don't want our clients to run for the hills. So here is my challenge: stop glorifying strong exposures. Too many people associate ERP with standing in filthy dumpsters or confronting intrusive thoughts head-on. Let's change our language, and see if a kinder, gentler approach to ERP - like Nik Wallenda uses - might reach more people and give us better long-term outcomes.